Sustainability · 11 August 2026

Twelve months of grading data, published

In short

Across twelve months, roughly 55 percent of intake was reusable without tools, 27 percent needed repair, 9 percent was dismantled for board harvest, 5 percent was remanufactured into other footprints, and 3 percent went to fibre. The most common single rejection reason was a cracked stringer, and the most common single repair was a replaced deck board — which together say most of what there is to say about this business.

Talk to us about this

If this piece describes a problem you actually have, describe it back to us in the message field. You will get a written answer from a person within one business day.

We reply by email only — no marketing list.

US or Canada, 10 digits — format as (513) 555-0142.

US ZIP like 45241, or Canadian like K1A 0B1.

Required fields are marked *. Your details go to our Evendale team and nowhere else — see the privacy policy.

The outdoor yard on a clear day, with stacks of recovered pallets including blue pooled units, beside the open doors of the building.
The yard at Evendale. Cores stay under the roofline wherever we can get them there — wet wood is worth measurably less.
Looking into a loaded trailer stacked with new EPAL and EUR-stamped Euro block pallets, banded and strapped in rows.
A trailer of EPAL block pallets loaded two-across. Every unit stamped, banded and counted before the doors close.

Where intake went

Measured by weight from weighbridge tickets, reconciled monthly.
OutcomeShare of intakeWhat it means
Direct reuse~55%Cleaned, inspected, graded, banded. No tools touched it
Repair~27%One or two members replaced; back to #1 or #2 grade
Board harvest~9%Frame beyond saving, lumber recovered as repair stock
Remanufacture~5%Rebuilt on a jig into a different footprint
Fibre recovery~3%Ground, magnet-separated twice, screened
Licensed disposal<1%Contaminated units and non-wood debris

Why units left the reuse stream

ReasonRelative frequencyUsual downstream outcome
Cracked or split stringerMost commonPlug, companion, or dismantle
Missing or broken deck boardsSecondBoard replacement at the bench
Shiner / protruding fastenerThirdRefastened and returned to the line
Moisture or mould bloomFourth — heavily seasonalDried and re-inspected, or dismantled
Contamination or stainingFifthSegregated; licensed disposal if chemical
Dimensional varianceSixthDiverted to non-automation stock

Cracked stringers leading the list is unsurprising and worth stating anyway: the stringer is the structural member, it is where fork trucks hit, and it is the component whose failure cannot be hidden. It is also why the first check in the grading sequence is the stringer, both faces.

The seasonal signal

Rejection rates from the reuse stream rise noticeably in spring. It would be easy to read that as grader drift, and we checked for exactly that. It is not. It is moisture: cores collected in March and April have spent weeks in Ohio rain, and wet wood grades worse on appearance, carries more mould risk and is structurally weaker while wet.

That single finding is why we now raise covered storage with every customer who sells cores regularly, and why the drop-trailer arrangement gets recommended as much for stock protection as for dock convenience. The data made a soft recommendation into a specific one.

~55%reused without any tool being used
~96%of wood returning to service, by weight
<1%to licensed disposal, reported by weight

Why publish it

Because a diversion rate on its own is a claim, and claims in this industry are not audited. Publishing the cascade underneath it — and the rejection reasons underneath that — gives anybody who wants to check a place to start. It also makes it much harder for us to quietly let a number drift, which is the more useful discipline.

We have revised two published constants downward since 2021 after customers' consultants made persuasive cases. If something here looks wrong to you, the same offer stands.

Appendix: the data behind this

Every piece on this site closes with the slice of our operating record that bears on what it argues. The full record is published at /resources/operating-record.

From the Evendale floor

The rejection distribution in full

This is the dataset the article discusses, published in the same form we work from internally.

Measured 1 September 2025 – 31 August 2026

Related reading