Economics · 10 February 2026

The first 90 days of a managed pallet programme

In short

A managed programme replaces separate supply, removal, repair and recycling vendors with one closed loop. Onboarding runs discovery in week one, written specification in week two, a single-site pilot through week six, and staged rollout to week twelve. The largest single contributor to first-year savings is almost never unit price — it is grade right-sizing, followed by paired delivery and collection freight.

Talk to us about this

If this piece describes a problem you actually have, describe it back to us in the message field. You will get a written answer from a person within one business day.

We reply by email only — no marketing list.

US or Canada, 10 digits — format as (513) 555-0142.

US ZIP like 45241, or Canadian like K1A 0B1.

Required fields are marked *. Your details go to our Evendale team and nowhere else — see the privacy policy.

The recycling bay, with "Pallet Recycling — Reuse, Repair, Recycle" and "Wood Only" signage, a bin of offcuts and damaged pallets waiting to be dismantled.
The recycling bay. Wood only — and a person pulls painted and chemically stained units before anything reaches a grinder.
An aisle inside the Evendale warehouse, lined with banded stacks of recycled wood pallets carrying lot tags, alongside stacks of black and blue plastic pallets.
Graded stock, banded and lot-tagged. A, B and #2 are held apart so what leaves the yard is what arrives at your dock.

Week one: discovery, and the invoices

We walk each site with your operations contact and we read two years of invoices. The walk tells us volumes, grades in actual use, dock constraints and where pallets accumulate. The invoices tell us what is being spent, and they are frequently more surprising than the walk.

The single most common discovery is a site paying to buy pallets and paying a waste hauler to remove pallets in the same month, from the same building. Neither invoice is large enough to attract attention alone. Together they are usually the largest avoidable cost on the site, and they are found by reading rather than by consulting.

Week two: a written specification

Grade by application, written down, and issued to receiving. Not "we use A grade" but: racked storage takes A or B #1; outbound distribution takes B #1; inbound receiving takes B #2; internal movement takes #2 economy. With rejection criteria attached, so a receiving clerk can apply it without judgement calls.

This document is where most of the savings originate. Over-specifying grade is the most expensive habit in pallet purchasing, and it persists because nobody ever writes down which pallets go where.

Weeks three to six: one site, running live

  1. Schedule set against real accumulation

    Not a guess. We size the collection cadence and the trailer against what the site actually generates, measured rather than estimated.

  2. Paired freight established

    Deliveries and collections combined onto single truck movements wherever geography allows. This is the second-largest saving and it requires nothing from you except telling us.

  3. Sort-and-repair stream started

    Damaged units are separated and assessed rather than scrapped. The proportion that needed one deck board is usually higher than anybody expects.

  4. Reporting baseline

    First month of weighbridge data, by destination stream. This becomes the number everything afterwards is measured against.

  5. Tuning

    Almost everything gets adjusted in weeks five and six. Trailer size, collection day, grade split. The pilot exists to be wrong cheaply.

Weeks seven to twelve: rollout, in volume order

Remaining sites come on largest first, because that is where the learning from the pilot has most value and because it front-loads the saving. Reporting consolidates into a corporate roll-up alongside per-site detail. Invoicing consolidates, with core credits netted against supply.

Ranked by frequency across accounts, not by universal magnitude — site circumstances vary.
Where the first-year saving comes fromTypical share
Grade right-sizingLargest single contributor
Paired delivery and collection freightSecond
Core value recovered rather than discardedThird
Repair instead of replacementFourth
Eliminated disposal chargesFifth
Unit price negotiationSmallest — and the one everybody starts with

Appendix: the data behind this

Every piece on this site closes with the slice of our operating record that bears on what it argues. The full record is published at /resources/operating-record.

From the Evendale floor

Freight share by distance band

Paired delivery and collection is the second-largest saving in a programme. This table shows how much of the invoice it is acting on.

Distance bandFreight shareCadenceNote
0 – 30 miles~6%Same day / next dayFreight is a rounding error. Grade choice dominates the invoice.
31 – 75 miles~11%Twice weeklyStill unit-price led. Split drops start to hurt here.
76 – 130 miles~19%WeeklyThe crossover band. Full loads materially cheaper per unit.
131 – 200 miles~27%Weekly / biweeklyRound-trip pairing becomes the single largest lever available.
201 – 250 miles~34%Biweekly consolidatedEdge of company equipment. Split drops rarely make sense.
251 – 400 miles~41%Consolidated / partnerBrokered at cost plus a disclosed fee. We label it as such.
Over 400 miles~48%Partner laneFreight exceeds the wood. We will usually say so and suggest somebody closer.
Measured 1 September 2025 – 31 August 2026

Related reading